Curating experts insights to tackle Covid-19 with Smarter Crowdsourcing
A new method to attract diverse ideas from global experts and rapidly develop actionable proposals.
Read this if you
Case study abstract
In the early 2000s, the UK government redesigned its institutions and policy design processes, at local and national levels, with the explicit aim of identifying, applying and sharing more effective solutions to prevent young offenders from committing crimes and going to prison.
By creating and sharing responsibility with the Youth Justice Board and Local Offending Teams and incentivizing them to work autonomously across silos, while playing a central role in monitoring, documenting, rewarding and spreading successes, the government was able to considerably lower the number of juvenile offenders sent to jail.
The fact that the government was able to stick to its innovative approach for over ten years helps explain how the players involved changed culture and methods, while the government’s difficulty in spreading the innovations to other policy issues sheds light on the challenges of building on success in a fraught political environment, however collectively intelligent the innovations may have been.
Inspiration, key principles, practical do’s and don’ts
In open acess thanks to the Porticus Foundation
Quick facts
Policy making steps
Contributors
Related resources
A new method to attract diverse ideas from global experts and rapidly develop actionable proposals.
How Slagelse used AI to gather citizen insights on health and well-being to craft local policy
Dreaming, remembering, scaling and innovating boldly to spread good ideas
For policy makers, researchers, activists and practitioners of collective intelligence
Every 2 weeks, you’ll get: